List your team, what you built the site with, and a short note — get a valid humans.txt file instantly. No email, no signup, nothing leaves your browser.
One person per line: Role | Name | Contact or site | Location — only Name is required, leave the rest blank if you don't need them.
One name or project per line. Optional.
humans.txt is a small community convention — not a web standard, and not read by search engines or AI crawlers — for putting a plain-text credits file at yoursite.com/humans.txt, the same location convention robots.txt and llms.txt use. Where those two files exist for automated visitors, humans.txt exists for the opposite reason: a person who's curious enough to check can see who actually built the site, what it's built with, and a short human note, without digging through a footer or an About page. See this post for the format's history and a closer look at the spec.
It costs almost nothing to add and it's a small, low-stakes way to credit a team, a freelancer, or an open-source dependency by name — useful for portfolio sites, agency work, and personal projects where "who made this" isn't otherwise obvious anywhere on the page. It's not a ranking factor and won't move a needle on traffic; it's closer to a signature than a piece of SEO infrastructure.
Upload the file to your site root so it's reachable at exactly yoursite.com/humans.txt — same convention as robots.txt. There's nothing to submit or register anywhere; it just needs to exist at that path for anyone who goes looking for it.
No — it isn't read by search engine crawlers or AI models, and has no effect on rankings or AI citations. That's the entire point of the convention: it's written for a human reader who checks the file on purpose, not for any automated system.
Same spirit, different format and audience. An About page is designed and linked in navigation for regular visitors; humans.txt is a plain-text file at a predictable URL that only people who already know the convention tend to check — the two aren't a substitute for each other, and plenty of sites use both.
No — Name is the only required field for a team entry, and every section (Team, Thanks, Site, Note) is independently optional. A minimal file with just one name and nothing else is still a valid humans.txt.
Yes, and they don't conflict — they're three unrelated conventions living at three separate paths in your site root, each answering a different question for a different reader. See this comparison for what each one actually does.